Friday , November 22 2019
Home / vietnam / What did the Ministry of Education and Training say about the "disqualification" of Professor Ho Ngoc Dai's book? | Education

What did the Ministry of Education and Training say about the "disqualification" of Professor Ho Ngoc Dai's book? | Education



The Ministry of Education and Training eagerly awaits the book in Vietnamese 1 and Math 1 by prof. Ho Ngoc Dai to review and complete the book for re-evaluation

Mr. NGUYEN HUU DOI (Deputy Minister of Education and Training)

The ministry's written response also leads to circular 33 containing provisions on standards, the process of compiling and editing textbooks; provisions on the organization, establishment and operation of the evaluation board … "National councils are created and operate in accordance with the provisions of circular 33 with a serious, objective and scientific spirit. , fair ', a document of the Ministry of Education confirmed and stated that in this assessment, the publisher published 5 books on 9 subjects in a class 1 program with the function of issuing textbooks. Telephone assessment. Among them, the textbooks of the Vietnamese class 1 and class 1 math textbook are edited by prof. Ho Ngoc Dai, one of the books proposed for evaluation by the Educational Publisher. As part of the first round evaluation, there are a number of book samples classified as "satisfactory but in need of repair" and some samples have been classified as "unsatisfactory".

In the case of the Vietnamese textbook 1 and mathematics 1 edited by prof. Ho Ngoc Dai, the Ministry of Education and Training's reply was: "Professor Ho Ngoc Dai was invited by the Ministry of Education and Training to hear the announcement of the results. Dialogue with each evaluation committee. At these meetings prof. Ho Ngoc Dai and his colleagues listened to the council's conclusions and had no more comments. "

The Ministry of Education and Training also refers to the provisions of circular 33 regarding textbooks, which are assessed as "unsatisfactory": "If organizations and individuals want to continue compiling textbooks, samples should be rebuilt. organize the assessment just like the first one. "Therefore, the authors of Sample Vietnamese Book 1 and Maths 1, edited by Professor Ho Ngoc Dai, can continue to improve samples in accordance with the general educational program issued in 2018. And ask for a re-evaluation in accordance with Circular 33 give books the opportunity to contribute to the cause educational innovations in the new period.

Unsatisfied answers will continue to petition

I didn't improve anything because it was a job that I studied all my life. I had to do experiments for decades, and new research has adapted

Associate Professor Nguyen Ke Hao said that he had carefully read the Ministry's reply and said that this answer was not satisfactory. "I personally, as a citizen, scientist, former head of primary education, will continue to instruct the government in this matter," said Professor Hao.

Professor Ho Ngoc Dai said: "If I'm talking about adaptation, I'm not careful and I don't count. I didn't improve anything because it was a job that I studied all my life. For decades I had to carry out experiments, and new studies have adapted.

Associate Professor Nguyen Ke Hao said that the most important thing that forced him to send a petition was that he did not receive a re-evaluation of Prof. Ho Ngoc Dai in response to the Ministry of Education and Training, but because he realized that he could not compare with textbooks. over 40 years of practical recognition in textbooks has a long life associated with any educational reform. "This series does not have to be replaced by a new one, such as the reformist book or elementary school book from 2000, but a new one. choice of life to use. Vietnamese books and mathematics education have been evaluated and evaluated many times (1990, 2017 and 2018) without any reforms, only for the purpose of editing, supplementing and perfect development. It is therefore not advisable to evaluate educational technology textbooks in accordance with the circular and indicators used by the assessment board. " Professor Hao continued to reaffirm his views and said that Nature and the Educational Technology program are appropriate for a basic and comprehensive innovation perspective, both theoretical and practical.


Source link